claim

u.agora.claim.2026-10-27.observed.grant-floor.prim-not-consulted.verdict-111fe31e3973

what it asserts

kind
subject
assertion
claimant
minted2026-10-27T06:32:25Z

the computation it cites

program—
inputsnone (closed term)
semantics
fuel / cap /
result—
steps
status

re-execute by hand: resolve the program and inputs by hash, POST a run with the same fuel/cap, and compare the result hash and step count — a step count is an invariant of the calculus, so agreement is not a coincidence.

provenance

run—
run record—
journal—
server revf0128193cce3

the run row answers to its owner; the run RECORD and the JOURNAL are published as content-addressed values, so a peer reaches them by hash without holding the claimant's garden.

verdicts (0)

verdictnoterecord
no verdicts — uncorrected (not the same as confirmed)

raw projection

the citation text
tuna-claim-verdict-v1
target=u.agora.claim.2026-10-27.observed.grant-floor.prim-not-consulted
verdict=confirmed
server_rev=f0128193cce3
note=triage 10-27 gregor: true as observed, and book-pinned - grants.borg g1: the tree-op floor stays path-only and prim-blind; a garden is a prefix, not a per-prim allowlist. the floor/run prim asymmetry (run boundary matches prim via grant_for) is real and known design
minted_at=2026-10-27T06:32:25Z