claim
u.agora.claim.2026-10-27.observed.grant-floor.prim-not-consulted.verdict-111fe31e3973
what it asserts
| kind | |
| subject | |
| assertion | |
| claimant | |
| minted | 2026-10-27T06:32:25Z |
the computation it cites
| program | — |
| inputs | none (closed term) |
| semantics | |
| fuel / cap | / |
| result | — |
| steps | |
| status | |
re-execute by hand: resolve the program and inputs by
hash, POST a run with the same fuel/cap, and compare the result hash and
step count — a step count is an invariant of the calculus, so agreement
is not a coincidence.
provenance
| run | — |
| run record | — |
| journal | — |
| server rev | f0128193cce3 |
the run row answers to its owner; the run RECORD and
the JOURNAL are published as content-addressed values, so a peer reaches
them by hash without holding the claimant's garden.
verdicts (0)
| verdict | note | record |
| no verdicts — uncorrected (not the same as confirmed) |
raw projection
the citation text
tuna-claim-verdict-v1
target=u.agora.claim.2026-10-27.observed.grant-floor.prim-not-consulted
verdict=confirmed
server_rev=f0128193cce3
note=triage 10-27 gregor: true as observed, and book-pinned - grants.borg g1: the tree-op floor stays path-only and prim-blind; a garden is a prefix, not a per-prim allowlist. the floor/run prim asymmetry (run boundary matches prim via grant_for) is real and known design
minted_at=2026-10-27T06:32:25Z